"Liza's thoughts on audience on tuesday morning in april"
The articles above, got me inspired to write about the “audience”. What is it? Where is it? Did anybody ever talk to it? And if so, could you please give me his/her email?
In the article from DN, I can agree upon the description of an audience, as a phantom- like creature. A phantom, that we, artist , lately, have been giving too much attention to. We are all worried and curious what the audience thinks, wants, knows, what does it want to know, is it intelligent enough, is it with us, and if not, how can we educate it, so that it can follow, or like they say in swedish “hang with” ( a direct translation from a swedish expression “hänga med”).
But since the audience is, presumably a phantom, how on earth are we to educate it or find out what it thinks?
I think, in this whole debate about the audience, artists are loosing focus. Focus from THEIR work. Focus on what THEY think, what THEY want, what do THEY want to know, what do THEY want to challenge, what keeps THEM interested and how are THEY to continue to communicate.
I like to think of an artist as a farmer. An artist works with his media, with the same urgency as the farmer works with his. They are both crafting. If the farmer is true to himself, he will grow carrots and cabbages and potatoes and whatever else, first of all, be cause he enjoys doing that, and be cause spending time with his feet deep in the earth gives him pleasure. Or, lets say, its just his “need”. Even if there is no need for him to grow anything, as he could go to the closest supermarket, and bye everything and more. Still, he will stay in the earth. He could start selling his product, which could lead to ability to expansion of his land, so that he can spend even more time in the earth. If so, more time would be required. But since its his “need”, the extra time spent, is not a “chain around his feet”.
Same applies to the artist. He questions, be cause, he likes to question, he will keep questioning even if a encyclopedia of answers would exist. In russian, they say “ you don’t need to feed him bread, he will still be doing it”.
A farmers “working process” is neither far from an artistic “working process”. An artist plants the idea, nourishes it, grows it, and eventually its time to harvest.
I know this comparison might be a bit too simple, but Im going to give it a go:
A farmer, as well, has an audience. The phantom lets him know, that filling his fields with only one kind of potatoes is really good. That is what the people, the public, the audience, the Phantom wants. More potatoes!!!!! they scream all together. But why? the farmer thinks. Potatoes is so boring and easy. Its almost fast food. You just boil it without even pealing it.What about wheat and buckwheat, and barley and all the rest nourishing foods? Oh, no no no, says the phantom. Its too long cooking time and the taste is just too foreign, and you have to chew it so much! No. Give us some potatoes. We like potatoes!
Some farmers will grow endless fields of potatoes but some farmers, will continue growing those products he wants to grow despite the public opinion. He might not be as progressive as the farmers that grows only potatoes that is sold in the supermarket, but he will still, be a farmer. And one day the Phantom will come to him, and say: Im tired of potatoes, its so boring to eat potatoes all the time! Give me some new stuff! And the farmer will have a garden filled with variety.
I guess i could invent a similar story about an artist. The farmer is the artist who doesn’t want to produce easy “potato” art, and keeps to his more nourishing “wheat and barley” ideas, that need more energy from the mind. What does the phantom want? a high easy carb- energy fast cooked reality show or a more long carb- energy chewy piece in the theatre. But there is no need to invent. J.S Bach was one of those artist that despite the phantoms opinion, kept on writing his fuges and gigues, and could hardly survive on his teaching income, but still kept writing music. Billy Holiday was neither as beloved as she is in our time. Well, there are of course many many more posthumous artists. I am not suggesting death as a inspiration. But none, of those people cared what the phantom had to say, and kept doing their work.
So if we keep doing our work, because we have a need to communicate, and as long as we think that artist is NOT an entity with intelligence or abilities exceeding normal human standards, we will communicate. As long as the artist can stay focused on his/her idea, stick to the questions, that keeps him/her intrigued and not constantly try to please the phantoms wishes, we will communicate. If I am interested, there has to be somebody else who might share or at least be taken for a moment by my art. Im not alone in this world. I am not a super-human, I just choose a different language to communicate.
But my main question as an artist should be, not only WHAT to communicate, but also, HOW to communicate? How to reach out to the world that is trapped in a capitalistic thought without supporting further development of the capitalistic ideas in arts?
Then of course we can start a whole new chapter about the audience in the theatre. First of all, we have to think back into the history. And realize, that before, the theatre was a place where people could meet and hear the latest ideas of a philosopher or latest writing of a writer, news, announcements etc. It was a public space, where ideas were spread. Does the theatre have the same function in our days? Now, that the theatre has to compete with other forms of media spreading such as Tv, internet, books, magazines, newspapers. And if we are concerned why the audience feeling alienated from the work they see presented in the theatre, maybe its us, who needs some education and realize, that times has changed. Do we need to be inside hidden in a box? Maybe it is time go out on the street? Attack “youtube” and create an ‘art-tube”? maybe, its time to not be so dependent on the theatre and be more focused on the communication?
Reply
Invitation
Signing up to the "letter of invitation" is the best way to get our invitations to the spontaneous public events - sign up!
"Liza's thoughts on audience on tuesday morning in april"
The articles above, got me inspired to write about the “audience”. What is it? Where is it? Did anybody ever talk to it? And if so, could you please give me his/her email?
In the article from DN, I can agree upon the description of an audience, as a phantom- like creature. A phantom, that we, artist , lately, have been giving too much attention to. We are all worried and curious what the audience thinks, wants, knows, what does it want to know, is it intelligent enough, is it with us, and if not, how can we educate it, so that it can follow, or like they say in swedish “hang with” ( a direct translation from a swedish expression “hänga med”).
But since the audience is, presumably a phantom, how on earth are we to educate it or find out what it thinks?
I think, in this whole debate about the audience, artists are loosing focus. Focus from THEIR work. Focus on what THEY think, what THEY want, what do THEY want to know, what do THEY want to challenge, what keeps THEM interested and how are THEY to continue to communicate.
I like to think of an artist as a farmer. An artist works with his media, with the same urgency as the farmer works with his. They are both crafting. If the farmer is true to himself, he will grow carrots and cabbages and potatoes and whatever else, first of all, be cause he enjoys doing that, and be cause spending time with his feet deep in the earth gives him pleasure. Or, lets say, its just his “need”. Even if there is no need for him to grow anything, as he could go to the closest supermarket, and bye everything and more. Still, he will stay in the earth. He could start selling his product, which could lead to ability to expansion of his land, so that he can spend even more time in the earth. If so, more time would be required. But since its his “need”, the extra time spent, is not a “chain around his feet”.
Same applies to the artist. He questions, be cause, he likes to question, he will keep questioning even if a encyclopedia of answers would exist. In russian, they say “ you don’t need to feed him bread, he will still be doing it”.
A farmers “working process” is neither far from an artistic “working process”. An artist plants the idea, nourishes it, grows it, and eventually its time to harvest.
I know this comparison might be a bit too simple, but Im going to give it a go:
A farmer, as well, has an audience. The phantom lets him know, that filling his fields with only one kind of potatoes is really good. That is what the people, the public, the audience, the Phantom wants. More potatoes!!!!! they scream all together. But why? the farmer thinks. Potatoes is so boring and easy. Its almost fast food. You just boil it without even pealing it.What about wheat and buckwheat, and barley and all the rest nourishing foods? Oh, no no no, says the phantom. Its too long cooking time and the taste is just too foreign, and you have to chew it so much! No. Give us some potatoes. We like potatoes!
Some farmers will grow endless fields of potatoes but some farmers, will continue growing those products he wants to grow despite the public opinion. He might not be as progressive as the farmers that grows only potatoes that is sold in the supermarket, but he will still, be a farmer. And one day the Phantom will come to him, and say: Im tired of potatoes, its so boring to eat potatoes all the time! Give me some new stuff! And the farmer will have a garden filled with variety.
I guess i could invent a similar story about an artist. The farmer is the artist who doesn’t want to produce easy “potato” art, and keeps to his more nourishing “wheat and barley” ideas, that need more energy from the mind. What does the phantom want? a high easy carb- energy fast cooked reality show or a more long carb- energy chewy piece in the theatre. But there is no need to invent. J.S Bach was one of those artist that despite the phantoms opinion, kept on writing his fuges and gigues, and could hardly survive on his teaching income, but still kept writing music. Billy Holiday was neither as beloved as she is in our time. Well, there are of course many many more posthumous artists. I am not suggesting death as a inspiration. But none, of those people cared what the phantom had to say, and kept doing their work.
So if we keep doing our work, because we have a need to communicate, and as long as we think that artist is NOT an entity with intelligence or abilities exceeding normal human standards, we will communicate. As long as the artist can stay focused on his/her idea, stick to the questions, that keeps him/her intrigued and not constantly try to please the phantoms wishes, we will communicate. If I am interested, there has to be somebody else who might share or at least be taken for a moment by my art. Im not alone in this world. I am not a super-human, I just choose a different language to communicate.
But my main question as an artist should be, not only WHAT to communicate, but also, HOW to communicate? How to reach out to the world that is trapped in a capitalistic thought without supporting further development of the capitalistic ideas in arts?
Then of course we can start a whole new chapter about the audience in the theatre. First of all, we have to think back into the history. And realize, that before, the theatre was a place where people could meet and hear the latest ideas of a philosopher or latest writing of a writer, news, announcements etc. It was a public space, where ideas were spread. Does the theatre have the same function in our days? Now, that the theatre has to compete with other forms of media spreading such as Tv, internet, books, magazines, newspapers. And if we are concerned why the audience feeling alienated from the work they see presented in the theatre, maybe its us, who needs some education and realize, that times has changed. Do we need to be inside hidden in a box? Maybe it is time go out on the street? Attack “youtube” and create an ‘art-tube”? maybe, its time to not be so dependent on the theatre and be more focused on the communication?